[PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

[Stephen Warren]

On 08/16/2012 12:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> 
>> Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power
>> sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must
>> admit this DT rule kinda sucks.
> 
> Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is
> there any reason we can't just change the rule?  It'd be rather more
> constructive...

I'll start a new thread on that topic and see. I would simplify matters
a lot...