[PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power
> sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must
> admit this DT rule kinda sucks.

Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is
there any reason we can't just change the rule?  It'd be rather more
constructive...