[PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

Stephen Warren swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Fri Aug 17 05:35:38 EST 2012


On 08/16/2012 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 12:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>
>>> Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power
>>> sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must
>>> admit this DT rule kinda sucks.
>>
>> Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is
>> there any reason we can't just change the rule?  It'd be rather more
>> constructive...
> 
> I'll start a new thread on that topic and see. I would simplify matters
> a lot...

In case anyone wants to follow it, it's at:

https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-August/018502.html



More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list