Fwd: Which repo is more stable, feature complete, most functionality? https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc or https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc

[James Mihm]

I meant to include the mailing list on my response.

James.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: James Mihm <james.mihm at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Which repo is more stable, feature complete, most
functionality? https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc or
https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc
To: Bruce Mitchell <Bruce_Mitchell at phoenix.com>


Bruce,

The Intel-BMC/openbmc repo is where we (i.e., Intel) pushes our
internal fork externally while in the process of upstreaming. The intent
for this repo is for it to be functional on an Intel development platform
(e.g., Wolfpass) at all times while upstreaming changes to the
openbmc/openbmc repo. The long term goal is for Intel to be pushing all
development upstream to the openbmc/openbmc repo, and using the Intel-BMC
repository for sharing future capabilities that are not yet publically
announced. Where our goal is to push our internal development fork to the
Intel-BMC/openbmc repo every two weeks.

Two exceptions for upstreaming are the webui and linux kernel patches.
Upstreaming the linux kernel patches is challenging and some of the patches
may never make it upstream. With the migration of the webui to vue.js
there's not much point in upstreaming the Intel fork of phosphor-webui.

My answer to your question is to use the openbmc/openbmc repository, but
not for controlling your car brakes.

James.



On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:27 PM Bruce Mitchell <Bruce_Mitchell at phoenix.com>
wrote:

> Which repo is more stable, feature complete, most functionality?
> https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc or https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc
>
> While the WebUI for https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc may look better,
> presently its functionality for BMC operation seems intermittent compared
> to the functionality of https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc.
> I am referring to basic things such as displaying the BMC's Firmware
> Version, the lack of displaying any NIC for Network Settings, the "hang"
> for Health Hardware Status.
>
> This is not a request about ahead or behind; I am asking about stable,
> feature complete, most functionality.
>
> Using a metaphor here; if you had to select today one of the 2 for
> controlling your car's breaks which would it be?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20200324/0e57045e/attachment.htm>