Fwd: Which repo is more stable, feature complete, most functionality? https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc or https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc

[Alexander Amelkin]

James, I have to disagree.

The last time I tried (Mar 12, commit 276f647402), the openbmc/openbmc 
repo was still unable to control power of the host system on Wolfpass. 
That is why we're still using Intel-BMC/openbmc for our wolfpass-based 
board in development.

On the other hand, the Intel-BMC/openbmc repo lacks virtual media support.

We would love to use the main openbmc/openbmc for our x86 board but so 
far it just doesn't work.

Alexander.

24.03.2020 21:11, James Mihm пишет:
> I meant to include the mailing list on my response.
>
> James.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *James Mihm* <james.mihm at gmail.com <mailto:james.mihm at gmail.com>>
> Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 7:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Which repo is more stable, feature complete, most 
> functionality? https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc or 
> https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc
> To: Bruce Mitchell <Bruce_Mitchell at phoenix.com 
> <mailto:Bruce_Mitchell at phoenix.com>>
>
>
> Bruce,
>
> The Intel-BMC/openbmc repo is where we (i.e., Intel) pushes our 
> internal fork externally while in the process of upstreaming. The 
> intent for this repo is for it to be functional on an Intel 
> development platform (e.g., Wolfpass) at all times while upstreaming 
> changes to the openbmc/openbmc repo. The long term goal is for Intel 
> to be pushing all development upstream to the openbmc/openbmc repo, 
> and using the Intel-BMC repository for sharing future capabilities 
> that are not yet publically announced. Where our goal is to push our 
> internal development fork to the Intel-BMC/openbmc repo every two weeks.
>
> Two exceptions for upstreaming are the webui and linux kernel patches. 
> Upstreaming the linux kernel patches is challenging and some of the 
> patches may never make it upstream. With the migration of the webui to 
> vue.js there's not much point in upstreaming the Intel fork of 
> phosphor-webui.
>
> My answer to your question is to use the openbmc/openbmc repository, 
> but not for controlling your car brakes.
>
> James.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:27 PM Bruce Mitchell 
> <Bruce_Mitchell at phoenix.com <mailto:Bruce_Mitchell at phoenix.com>> wrote:
>
>     Which repo is more stable, feature complete, most functionality?
>     https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc or
>     https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc
>
>     While the WebUI for https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc may look
>     better,
>     presently its functionality for BMC operation seems intermittent
>     compared to the functionality of https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc.
>     I am referring to basic things such as displaying the BMC's
>     Firmware Version, the lack of displaying any NIC for Network
>     Settings, the "hang" for Health Hardware Status.
>
>     This is not a request about ahead or behind; I am asking about
>     stable, feature complete, most functionality.
>
>     Using a metaphor here; if you had to select today one of the 2 for
>     controlling your car's breaks which would it be?
>
>     Thank you.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20200325/b36b67f2/attachment.htm>