ppc32: Weird process scheduling behaviour with 2.6.24-rc

Ingo Molnar mingo at elte.hu
Mon Jan 28 23:56:31 EST 2008

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra at chello.nl> wrote:

> > i think it would be OK to do half of this: make it easier to preempt 
> > a +nice task. Michel, do you really need the -nice portion as well? 
> > It's not a problem to super-preempt positively reniced tasks, but it 
> > can be quite annoying if negatively reniced tasks have super-slices.
> This should do that (unless I need a stronger cup of tea).

cool - thanks Peter. Michel, could you check Peter's patch, does it 
resolve all the interactivity problems you've been seeing?


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list