[Cbe-oss-dev] Time for cell code reshuffle?
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Sun Dec 23 23:35:01 EST 2007
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:47:42PM +0900, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > To the question, where what it should go, I'd leave the decision to
> > Jeremy, but my current idea would be:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs -> arch/powerpc/spufs
>
> I'd suggest arch/powerpc/sysdev/spufs to keep arch/powerpc clean.
>
> However, this may also depend on the (intended) structure of SPURSEngine
> support, which may mean that fs/spufs might be a better place. It would
> suck to have to move things twice, so maybe someone from Tosihba could
> provide some input? Would the powerpc spufs code be suitable for
> SPURSEngine?
Strong NACK for fs/spufs/ fs code is the smallest part of the spu
support, and all this nasty lowlevel code doesn't belong into fs/ at
all.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list