[Skiboot] [PATCH V3 6/6] external/pflash: Allow the libffs TOC to operate on to be specified
Cyril Bur
cyril.bur at au1.ibm.com
Mon Jun 1 16:29:25 AEST 2015
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 16:12 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:30:17 Cyril Bur wrote:
> > On systems with multiple TOCs it may be useful to be able to specify which
> > one should be operated on.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur at au1.ibm.com>
> > ---
>
> <snip>
>
> > + if (info ) {
> > + /*
> > + * Don't pass through modfied TOC value if the modification
> was done
> > + * because of --size, but still respect if it came from --toc
>
> because of --side?
>
> (we
> > + * assume the user knows what they're doing in that case)
> > + */
> > + print_flash_info(flash_side ? 0 : ffs_toc);
>
> So we don't respect --side with --info? I'm not saying we need to or that it
> even makes sense to, but it might be nice if we told the user that specifying
> --side with --info is invalid or ignored.
>
It will be obvious from the output because it will print where each TOC
is, so you'll see the --info for TOC at 0x0 and then presumably
TOC@[side1]. But then you're probably right that someone will manage to
get confused...
Were you thinking something in the usage text or some kind of a warning
here? I could send a v4 of just 6/6 with added usage text...
> - Alistair
>
> > + }
> > if (do_read)
> > do_read_file(read_file, address, read_size);
> > if (erase_all)
>
More information about the Skiboot
mailing list