<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>James, I have to disagree. <br>
</p>
<p>The last time I tried (Mar 12, commit 276f647402), the
openbmc/openbmc repo was still unable to control power of the host
system on Wolfpass. That is why we're still using
Intel-BMC/openbmc for our wolfpass-based board in development.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the Intel-BMC/openbmc repo lacks virtual media
support.</p>
<p>We would love to use the main openbmc/openbmc for our x86 board
but so far it just doesn't work.<br>
</p>
<p>Alexander.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">24.03.2020 21:11, James Mihm пишет:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADy_Pt2mZ8E4EgY0y3wRSLh080cBBmoERgJvR7Lk8Rj4ep39-w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I meant to include the mailing list on my response.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>James.</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">---------- Forwarded message
---------<br>
From: <strong class="gmail_sendername" dir="auto">James
Mihm</strong> <span dir="auto"><<a
href="mailto:james.mihm@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">james.mihm@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 7:11 PM<br>
Subject: Re: Which repo is more stable, feature complete,
most functionality? <a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc</a>
or <a href="https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc</a><br>
To: Bruce Mitchell <<a
href="mailto:Bruce_Mitchell@phoenix.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">Bruce_Mitchell@phoenix.com</a>><br>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">Bruce,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The Intel-BMC/openbmc repo is where we (i.e., Intel)
pushes our internal fork externally while in the process
of upstreaming. The intent for this repo is for it to be
functional on an Intel development platform (e.g.,
Wolfpass) at all times while upstreaming changes to the
openbmc/openbmc repo. The long term goal is for Intel to
be pushing all development upstream to the openbmc/openbmc
repo, and using the Intel-BMC repository for sharing
future capabilities that are not yet publically announced.
Where our goal is to push our internal development fork to
the Intel-BMC/openbmc repo every two weeks. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Two exceptions for upstreaming are the webui and linux
kernel patches. Upstreaming the linux kernel patches is
challenging and some of the patches may never make it
upstream. With the migration of the webui to vue.js
there's not much point in upstreaming the Intel fork of
phosphor-webui. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My answer to your question is to use the
openbmc/openbmc repository, but not for controlling your
car brakes.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>James. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at
4:27 PM Bruce Mitchell <<a
href="mailto:Bruce_Mitchell@phoenix.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Bruce_Mitchell@phoenix.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Which repo is more
stable, feature complete, most functionality? <a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc</a>
or <a href="https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc</a><br>
<br>
While the WebUI for <a
href="https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/Intel-BMC/openbmc</a>
may look better,<br>
presently its functionality for BMC operation seems
intermittent compared to the functionality of <a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc</a>.<br>
I am referring to basic things such as displaying the
BMC's Firmware Version, the lack of displaying any NIC for
Network Settings, the "hang" for Health Hardware Status.
<br>
<br>
This is not a request about ahead or behind; I am asking
about stable, feature complete, most functionality.<br>
<br>
Using a metaphor here; if you had to select today one of
the 2 for controlling your car's breaks which would it be?<br>
<br>
Thank you.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>