OpenBMC 2.8 Release

[Prashanth Katti1]

Hi All,
We tested Firmware version : 2.8.0-rc1-0-g35a774200 on Witherspoon, and 
found following issues.

DHCP                    - https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/issues/127
LDAP                     - 
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2020-May/021702.html
VLAN via REST - https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3668
VLAN via IPMI     - 
https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12

Rest of the functionalities looks good and are stable in our testing.
Hope this input helps.

Prashanth Katti




From:   krtaylor <kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com>
To:     OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org>
Date:   03-06-2020 00:46
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: OpenBMC 2.8 Release
Sent by:        "openbmc" 
<openbmc-bounces+gkeishin=in.ibm.com at lists.ozlabs.org>



On 5/4/20 1:29 AM, Deepak Kodihalli wrote:
> On 04/05/20 10:43 am, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, at 02:30, Gunnar Mills wrote:
>>> On 4/29/2020 10:48 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote:
>>>> just add it directly here:
>>>> 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openbmc_openbmc_wiki_Current-2DRelease-2DContent&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=hHlxml_LX5HIffRsSFs-k3DrxQDKe6i0A3XGNW7rlIw&m=kawJxYAUDgnBEzwq08eGCJz6bv-YZv_H6QkLZavbRYw&s=nwFvaArvxP3BE4HNXG78g9M1NdfDYg-mzFTpR4M8ExE&e= 

>>> Added:
>>>   * Yocto refresh to "Dunfell" version 3.1
>>>   * Redfish support for: full certificate management, complete LDAP
>>> management, full sensor support, event service schema, task schema
>>>   * Move to Redfish Specification 1.9.0
>>>   * Redfish support for 2019.4 Schemas
>>>   * GUI enhancements: LDAP, certificate management

We are targeting this Friday, June 5th for release 2.8. I'm not seeing 
much (or any) discussion on testing. If you have tested the release tag 
please post the results for your platform. Any blockers?

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openbmc_openbmc_releases&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=hHlxml_LX5HIffRsSFs-k3DrxQDKe6i0A3XGNW7rlIw&m=kawJxYAUDgnBEzwq08eGCJz6bv-YZv_H6QkLZavbRYw&s=4KkaACZFdDxq5Phs31Fs_nlURFJIXumLI7vz9UiNsRY&e= 


Also, please review and add content to the release notes here:

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.openbmc-2Dproject.xyz_c_openbmc_docs_-2B_32440&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=hHlxml_LX5HIffRsSFs-k3DrxQDKe6i0A3XGNW7rlIw&m=kawJxYAUDgnBEzwq08eGCJz6bv-YZv_H6QkLZavbRYw&s=MEQ-gEqOh4TVe_I2P8XWbDy3z74mr6cLP5PuVrDIw94&e= 


Thanks everyone!

Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)

>>>
>>> And removed "`Redfish configuration backup and restore function`".
>>> James, Jason are you okay with the Redfish list above? Should we add
>>> something about Storage & Drives? Anything else?
>>>
>>> Should we add something about the Kernel? "Move to 5.4"?
>>>
>>> Anything for PLDM / MCTP? For the 2.7 release it says "Partial PLDM
>>> Support" and "Partial MCTP Support".
>>
>> Certainly MCTP support is still "Partial". Slowly progressing with 
>> help from
>> Intel.
> 
> Same goes for PLDM. There's definitely more PLDM specs and commands 
> implemented in libpldm since the 2.7 release though.
> 
>> Andrew
>>
> 






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20200605/74dd90b4/attachment.htm>