OpenBMC 2.8 Release

Vijay Khemka vijaykhemka at fb.com
Wed Jun 3 06:45:50 AEST 2020


I will mark this https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/x86-power-control/+/32852/ as ablocker because fan controller is not starting.

On 6/2/20, 12:15 PM, "openbmc on behalf of krtaylor" <openbmc-bounces+vijaykhemka=fb.com at lists.ozlabs.org on behalf of kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/4/20 1:29 AM, Deepak Kodihalli wrote:
    > On 04/05/20 10:43 am, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, at 02:30, Gunnar Mills wrote:
    >>> On 4/29/2020 10:48 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote:
    >>>> just add it directly here:
    >>>> https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Current-Release-Content
    >>> Added:
    >>>   * Yocto refresh to "Dunfell" version 3.1
    >>>   * Redfish support for: full certificate management, complete LDAP
    >>> management, full sensor support, event service schema, task schema
    >>>   * Move to Redfish Specification 1.9.0
    >>>   * Redfish support for 2019.4 Schemas
    >>>   * GUI enhancements: LDAP, certificate management

    We are targeting this Friday, June 5th for release 2.8. I'm not seeing 
    much (or any) discussion on testing. If you have tested the release tag 
    please post the results for your platform. Any blockers?

    https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/releases

    Also, please review and add content to the release notes here:

    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.openbmc-2Dproject.xyz_c_openbmc_docs_-2B_32440&d=DwIDaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=v9MU0Ki9pWnTXCWwjHPVgpnCR80vXkkcrIaqU7USl5g&m=SCTfbRzA0xQzD5pnD0lYwRo4srEwpxQ0kcsv-gPgA6I&s=g926GVkBfYTjOLl7ACoTf-_TXmRTWkk7tqBKw9qXMYc&e= 

    Thanks everyone!

    Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)

    >>>
    >>> And removed "`Redfish configuration backup and restore function`".
    >>> James, Jason are you okay with the Redfish list above? Should we add
    >>> something about Storage & Drives? Anything else?
    >>>
    >>> Should we add something about the Kernel? "Move to 5.4"?
    >>>
    >>> Anything for PLDM / MCTP? For the 2.7 release it says "Partial PLDM
    >>> Support" and "Partial MCTP Support".
    >>
    >> Certainly MCTP support is still "Partial". Slowly progressing with 
    >> help from
    >> Intel.
    > 
    > Same goes for PLDM. There's definitely more PLDM specs and commands 
    > implemented in libpldm since the 2.7 release though.
    > 
    >> Andrew
    >>
    > 




More information about the openbmc mailing list