openbmc qemu vs Cedric qemu is different

Chris Austen austenc at us.ibm.com
Sat Jul 16 01:58:12 AEST 2016


Sounds like you have a workable plan.  Thank you.  The test team will run
off of https://github.com/legoater/qemu (branch:aspeed) until the
openbmc/qemu gets the needed updates.


Chris Austen
POWER Systems Enablement Manager
(512) 286-5184 (T/L: 363-5184)



From:	Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au>
To:	Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>, Chris Austen/Austin/IBM at IBMUS,
            openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org
Cc:	Cedric Le Goater <clegoater at fr.ibm.com>
Date:	07/15/2016 05:20 AM
Subject:	Re: openbmc qemu vs Cedric qemu is different



On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:12 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 13:27 -0500, Chris Austen wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> > last night you indicated that our openbmc/qemu had enough for
> > networking the palmetto-bmc. I don't think that is 100% true. I
> > believe Cedric's repo has some additional changes that should be
> > integrated back in to openbmc/qemu. Hopefully you two can figure out
> > what commits are needed to get us back to one working repo.
> I don't recall claming that. I think you're confusing me with Andrew.

Sounds about right.

>
> I'll let Andrew clarify the situation.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joel
>
> >
> >
> >
> > causten at causten-VirtualBox:~/gitstuff/obmcqemu/build/arm-softmmu
> > $ ./qemu-system-arm -m 256 -M palmetto-bmc -nographic \
> > >
> > > -drive file=~/palmetto-qemu/flash-palmetto,format=raw,if=mtd \
> > > -net nic,macaddr=C0:FF:EE:00:00:02,model=ftgmac100 \
> > > -net bridge,id=net0,helper=/usr/lib/qemu-bridge-helper,br=virbr0
> > qemu-system-arm: Unsupported NIC model: ftgmac100

Cedric's outlined the differences between his github repo and
openbmc/qemu, but I wouldn't have thought the differences would account
for this. Have you confirmed you're running the right qemu-system-arm
binary?

I believe I tested the networking before pushing Cedric's changes to
openbmc/qemu around 3 weeks ago, but I could be mistaken. Having said
that, as Cedric outlined, there may be some broken behaviour due to
fixes for ASPEED's movement of the EDO[RT]R bits in the MAC, so we
should resolve any issues as soon as possible.

Unfortunately I haven't kept pace with Cedric's work as I've been
distracted with other problems, but I intend on making up what ground I
can after I send my kernel patches upstream.

Cheers,

Andrew[attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Chris Austen/Austin/IBM]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20160715/8b0f36a7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20160715/8b0f36a7/attachment.gif>


More information about the openbmc mailing list