openbmc qemu vs Cedric qemu is different
andrew at aj.id.au
Fri Jul 15 20:19:45 AEST 2016
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:12 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> Hello Chris,
> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 13:27 -0500, Chris Austen wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> > last night you indicated that our openbmc/qemu had enough for
> > networking the palmetto-bmc. I don't think that is 100% true. I
> > believe Cedric's repo has some additional changes that should be
> > integrated back in to openbmc/qemu. Hopefully you two can figure out
> > what commits are needed to get us back to one working repo.
> I don't recall claming that. I think you're confusing me with Andrew.
Sounds about right.
> I'll let Andrew clarify the situation.
> > causten at causten-VirtualBox:~/gitstuff/obmcqemu/build/arm-softmmu
> > $ ./qemu-system-arm -m 256 -M palmetto-bmc -nographic \
> > >
> > > -drive file=~/palmetto-qemu/flash-palmetto,format=raw,if=mtd \
> > > -net nic,macaddr=C0:FF:EE:00:00:02,model=ftgmac100 \
> > > -net bridge,id=net0,helper=/usr/lib/qemu-bridge-helper,br=virbr0
> > qemu-system-arm: Unsupported NIC model: ftgmac100
Cedric's outlined the differences between his github repo and
openbmc/qemu, but I wouldn't have thought the differences would account
for this. Have you confirmed you're running the right qemu-system-arm
I believe I tested the networking before pushing Cedric's changes to
openbmc/qemu around 3 weeks ago, but I could be mistaken. Having said
that, as Cedric outlined, there may be some broken behaviour due to
fixes for ASPEED's movement of the EDO[RT]R bits in the MAC, so we
should resolve any issues as soon as possible.
Unfortunately I haven't kept pace with Cedric's work as I've been
distracted with other problems, but I intend on making up what ground I
can after I send my kernel patches upstream.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the openbmc