<html><body><p>Sounds like you have a workable plan. Thank you. The test team will run off of <a href="https://github.com/legoater/qemu">https://github.com/legoater/qemu</a> (branch:aspeed) until the openbmc/qemu gets the needed updates. <br><br><br>Chris Austen<br>POWER Systems Enablement Manager <br>(512) 286-5184 (T/L: 363-5184)<br><br><img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=09BBF562DFC41CBD8f9e8a93df938690918c09B@" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Andrew Jeffery ---07/15/2016 05:20:17 AM---On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:12 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote: > H"><font color="#424282">Andrew Jeffery ---07/15/2016 05:20:17 AM---On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:12 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote: > Hello Chris,</font><br><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, Chris Austen/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Cc: </font><font size="2">Cedric Le Goater <clegoater@fr.ibm.com></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">07/15/2016 05:20 AM</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">Re: openbmc qemu vs Cedric qemu is different</font><br><hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br><br><br><tt>On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:12 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:<br>> Hello Chris,<br>> <br>> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 13:27 -0500, Chris Austen wrote:<br>> > <br>> > Hi Joel, <br>> > last night you indicated that our openbmc/qemu had enough for<br>> > networking the palmetto-bmc. I don't think that is 100% true. I<br>> > believe Cedric's repo has some additional changes that should be<br>> > integrated back in to openbmc/qemu. Hopefully you two can figure out<br>> > what commits are needed to get us back to one working repo. <br>> I don't recall claming that. I think you're confusing me with Andrew.<br><br>Sounds about right.<br><br>> <br>> I'll let Andrew clarify the situation.<br>> <br>> Cheers,<br>> <br>> Joel<br>> <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > causten@causten-VirtualBox:~/gitstuff/obmcqemu/build/arm-softmmu<br>> > $ ./qemu-system-arm -m 256 -M palmetto-bmc -nographic \<br>> > > <br>> > > -drive file=~/palmetto-qemu/flash-palmetto,format=raw,if=mtd \<br>> > > -net nic,macaddr=C0:FF:EE:00:00:02,model=ftgmac100 \<br>> > > -net bridge,id=net0,helper=/usr/lib/qemu-bridge-helper,br=virbr0<br>> > qemu-system-arm: Unsupported NIC model: ftgmac100 <br><br>Cedric's outlined the differences between his github repo and<br>openbmc/qemu, but I wouldn't have thought the differences would account<br>for this. Have you confirmed you're running the right qemu-system-arm<br>binary?<br><br>I believe I tested the networking before pushing Cedric's changes to<br>openbmc/qemu around 3 weeks ago, but I could be mistaken. Having said<br>that, as Cedric outlined, there may be some broken behaviour due to<br>fixes for ASPEED's movement of the EDO[RT]R bits in the MAC, so we<br>should resolve any issues as soon as possible.<br><br>Unfortunately I haven't kept pace with Cedric's work as I've been<br>distracted with other problems, but I intend on making up what ground I<br>can after I send my kernel patches upstream.<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Andrew[attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Chris Austen/Austin/IBM] </tt><br><BR>
</body></html>