[NEMO-devel] Is this a bug?

Yusak Tanoto yusak.tanoto at gmail.com
Thu Sep 14 17:49:31 AEST 2017 

Thank you so much Dr. Ben. I didn't consider this before. I re-arranged it
and it works now.

Cheers,

Yusak

On Sep 14, 2017 4:41 PM, "Yusak Tanoto" <yusak.tanoto at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dr. Ben
>
>
> I developed a scenario with PV as a candidate as follows and I found that
> PV capacity is existed in the simulation results but with no energy
> supplied (only surplus) and no LCOE, so there would be large unused energy.
>
> #yusak add JAMALI-PV with polygon
> def jamali_pv(context):
>     result = []
>     for poly in range(1, 7):
>         result.append(generators.Black_Coal(poly, 0, label='polygon %d Black_Coal' % poly))
>     for poly in range(1, 7):
>         result.append(generators.OCGT(poly, 0, label='polygon %d OCGT' % poly))
>     for poly in range(1, 7):
>         result.append(generators.CCGT(poly, 0, label='polygon %d CCGT' % poly))
>     #for poly in range(1, 7):
>         #result.append(generators.Diesel(poly, 0, label='polygon %d Diesel' % poly))
>     for poly in range(1, 7):
>         result.append(generators.Geothermal2(poly, 0, label='polygon %d Geothermal2' % poly))
>     for poly in range(1, 7):
>         result.append(generators.Hydro(poly, 0, label='polygon %d Hydro' % poly))
>     for poly in range(1, 7):
>             result.append(generators.PumpedHydro(poly, 0,1000, label='polygon %d PumpedHydro' % poly))
>     for poly in range(1, 7):
>         result.append(generators.PV1Axis(poly, 0,
>                     configfile.get('generation', 'pv1axis-trace'),
>                     poly - 1,
>                     build_limit=polygons.pv_limit[poly],
>                     label='polygon %d PV' % poly))
>
>     context.generators = result
>
>
>         polygon 3 PumpedHydro (JAVA:3), 0.78 GW
>            supplied 0.03433 TWh, CF 0.5%, capcost $3,555,962,795, opcost $37,602,927, LCOE $7833, ran 123 hours
>         polygon 4 PumpedHydro (JAVA:4), 0.00 GW
>            supplied 0 TWh, ran 0 hours
>         polygon 5 PumpedHydro (JAVA:5), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 0.01144 TWh, CF 0.1%, capcost $9,154,000,000, opcost $96,800,000, LCOE $60522, ran 37 hours
>         polygon 6 PumpedHydro (BALI:6), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 0.001403 TWh, CF 0.0%, capcost $9,154,000,000, opcost $96,800,000, LCOE $493403, ran 8 hours
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *polygon 1 PV (JAVA:1), 0.00 GW           supplied 0 TWh        polygon 2 PV (JAVA:2), 0.04 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 0.1 TWh, capcost $30,476,905, opcost $425,655        polygon 3 PV (JAVA:3), 2.02 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 3.2 TWh, capcost $1,449,516,607, opcost $20,244,645        polygon 4 PV (JAVA:4), 2.50 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 4.0 TWh, capcost $1,790,997,772, opcost $25,013,935        polygon 5 PV (JAVA:5), 0.34 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 0.6 TWh, capcost $245,586,521, opcost $3,429,979        polygon 6 PV (BALI:6), 3.32 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 5.4 TWh, capcost $2,374,415,086, opcost $33,162,221*
> Timesteps: 8760 h
> Demand energy: 166.6 TWh
> Unused surplus energy: 13.2 TWh
> Timesteps with unused surplus energy: 4732
> No unserved energy
> No Loss of Load
> Score: 82.64 $/MWh
> Total emissions: 70.64 MtCO2
> Done
>
>         polygon 1 Geothermal2 (JAVA:1), 1.38 GW
>            supplied 12.13 TWh, CF 100.0%, capcost $5,918,042,682, opcost $198,052,914, LCOE $48, ran 8,760 hours
>         polygon 2 Geothermal2 (JAVA:2), 0.15 GW
>            supplied 1.271 TWh, CF 100.0%, capcost $620,053,353, opcost $20,750,673, LCOE $48, ran 8,760 hours
>         polygon 3 Geothermal2 (JAVA:3), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 17.52 TWh, CF 100.0%, capcost $8,546,000,000, opcost $286,000,000, LCOE $48, ran 8,760 hours
>         polygon 4 Geothermal2 (JAVA:4), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 17.46 TWh, CF 99.7%, capcost $8,546,000,000, opcost $286,000,000, LCOE $48, ran 8,756 hours
>         polygon 5 Geothermal2 (JAVA:5), 0.77 GW
>            supplied 6.661 TWh, CF 99.0%, capcost $3,281,744,283, opcost $109,826,686, LCOE $48, ran 8,689 hours
>         polygon 6 Geothermal2 (BALI:6), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 17.15 TWh, CF 97.9%, capcost $8,546,000,000, opcost $286,000,000, LCOE $49, ran 8,656 hours
>         polygon 1 Hydro (JAVA:1), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 15.68 TWh, CF 89.5%, opcost $80,000,000, LCOE $5, ran 8,416 hours
>         polygon 2 Hydro (JAVA:2), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 11.58 TWh, CF 66.1%, opcost $80,000,000, LCOE $6, ran 7,023 hours
>         polygon 3 Hydro (JAVA:3), 0.60 GW
>            supplied 2.532 TWh, CF 48.0%, opcost $24,077,864, LCOE $9, ran 4,552 hours
>         polygon 4 Hydro (JAVA:4), 0.00 GW
>            supplied 0 TWh, ran 0 hours
>         polygon 5 Hydro (JAVA:5), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 5.606 TWh, CF 32.0%, opcost $80,000,000, LCOE $14, ran 3,908 hours
>         polygon 6 Hydro (BALI:6), 2.00 GW
>            supplied 1.129 TWh, CF 6.4%, opcost $80,000,000, LCOE $70, ran 1,495 hours
>         polygon 1 PumpedHydro (JAVA:1), 0.00 GW
>            supplied 0 TWh, ran 0 hours
>         polygon 2 PumpedHydro (JAVA:2), 0.00 GW
>            supplied 0 TWh, ran 0 hours
>         polygon 3 PumpedHydro (JAVA:3), 0.06 GW
>            supplied 0.002553 TWh, CF 0.5%, capcost $283,623,022, opcost $2,999,203, LCOE $8401, ran 48 hours
>         polygon 4 PumpedHydro (JAVA:4), 0.78 GW
>            supplied 0.00541 TWh, CF 0.1%, capcost $3,551,330,561, opcost $37,553,943, LCOE $49646, ran 34 hours
>         polygon 5 PumpedHydro (JAVA:5), 0.00 GW
>            supplied 0 TWh, ran 0 hours
>         polygon 6 PumpedHydro (BALI:6), 0.00 GW
>            supplied 0 TWh, ran 0 hours
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *polygon 1 PV (JAVA:1), 4.44 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 6.8 TWh, capcost $3,181,657,027, opcost $44,436,550        polygon 2 PV (JAVA:2), 0.00 GW           supplied 0 TWh        polygon 3 PV (JAVA:3), 4.69 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 7.5 TWh, capcost $3,360,305,785, opcost $46,931,645        polygon 4 PV (JAVA:4), 0.00 GW           supplied 0 TWh        polygon 5 PV (JAVA:5), 0.71 GW           supplied 0 TWh, surplus 1.2 TWh, capcost $510,190,867, opcost $7,125,570        polygon 6 PV (BALI:6), 0.00 GW           supplied 0 TWh*
> Timesteps: 8760 h
> Demand energy: 166.6 TWh
> Unused surplus energy: 15.4 TWh
> Timesteps with unused surplus energy: 4616
> No unserved energy
> No Loss of Load
> Score: 65.59 $/MWh
> Total emissions: 42.8 MtCO2
> Done
>
> To check it, I developed another scenario with PV but this time using wildcard and it ran well.
>
> #yusak add JAMALI-PV without polygon
> def jamali_pvnopolygon(context):
>     black_coal = generators.Black_Coal(polygons.wildcard, 0)
>     ocgt = generators.OCGT(polygons.wildcard, 0)
>     ccgt = generators.CCGT(polygons.wildcard, 0)
>     diesel = generators.Diesel(polygons.wildcard, 0)
>     hydro = generators.Hydro(polygons.wildcard, 0)
>     pumpedhydro = generators.PumpedHydro(polygons.wildcard, 0, 1000)
>     geothermal2 = generators.Geothermal2(polygons.wildcard, 0)
>     pv = generators.PV1Axis(polygons.wildcard, 0,configfile.get('generation', 'pv1axis-trace'),polygons.wildcard - 1,
>                     build_limit=polygons.pv_limit[polygons.wildcard],
>                     label='polygon %d PV' % polygons.wildcard)
>     context.generators = [black_coal] + [ocgt] + [ccgt] + [diesel] + [hydro] + [pumpedhydro] + [geothermal2] + [pv]
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Yusak
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/nemo-devel/attachments/20170914/0e8e738e/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the nemo-devel mailing list