srp.h and viosrp.h
Troy Benjegerdes
hozer at hozed.org
Sat Dec 20 02:32:40 EST 2003
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 01:38:46AM -0600, David Boutcher wrote:
>
> owner-linuxppc64-dev at lists.linuxppc.org wrote on 12/11/2003 11:08:03 PM:
> > I just had a look at srp.h and viosrp.h in drivers/scsi in the ameslab
> > 2.4 tree. These can't be submitted in their present form. Firstly,
> > they have no copyright notice, and secondly, they have no comments at
> > the top explaining what the files are and what they relate to (and
> > very few comments explaining the definitions mean). Finally, why are
> > these files in drivers/scsi rather than include/something?
>
> Ya, Hollis already made similar comments. I'm in Germany right now with
> limited access to the network, so I'll fix them up next week.
>
> I debated where they should live....they are very SCSI oriented, so
> drivers/scsi seemed like a reasonable place. A fact that will be clearer
> once I put comments in them :-)
>
> Dave Boutcher
> IBM Linux Technology Center
Is this the same SRP I keep hearing about in Infiniband? If so, are we
going to wind up with conflicts with infiniband drivers?
Have you take a look at the sourceforge infiniband stack at all? (the
only open source stack I know of so far)
This sounds like something that should go in include/ somewhere, and we
ought to try and work with other people working on it elsewhere.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' hozer at drgw.net
** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list