Device Tree tool [was RE: [PATCH] Consolidate XILINX_VIRTEXboardsupport]
Stephen Neuendorffer
stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com
Thu Aug 16 02:14:27 EST 2007
I don't have an EDK script. I'm currently using a hacked version of
Grant's gen_mhs_devtree.py script, and then I modified the resulting
device
tree in an effort to get things working. In the long term, I think
having
an EDK script will be necessary to ensure that all of the information is
in the device tree.
Michal: what do you need from me?
Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michal Simek [mailto:Monstr at seznam.cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:42 PM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: Grant Likely; microblaze-uclinux at itee.uq.edu.au;
> linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: Device Tree tool [was RE: [PATCH] Consolidate
> XILINX_VIRTEXboardsupport]
>
> Hi,
>
> >I've managed to get the first step working: a microblaze system
> >advertising of_devices in 2.6 using a flat device tree.
>
> It's great news.
>
> >Is there a concensus on how microblaze systems should get booted?
> >Currently,
> >I'm linking the device tree directly into the kernel itself,
> loading the
> >whole
> >mess using SystemAce and the start address jumps directly into the
> >kernel, which
> >is quite a bit different than the way powerpc works. It's certainly
> >simpler:
> >maybe too simple. At the same time, replicating
> >the complexity of arch/powerpc with separate boot code may
> or may not be
> >worth it...
> >Any thoughts?
>
> Microblaze can be boot via U-BOOT. U-BOOT supports FDT for
> some PowerPC boards.
> I would like to help with this part of bootloader code.
>
> Do you have any EDK script for generation FDT?
>
> Best regards,
> Michal Simek
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list