Upgrading cramfs root file system
Wojciech Kromer
wojciech.kromer at dgt.com.pl
Fri Apr 21 16:42:01 EST 2006
Dnia 2006-04-20 22:18, Użytkownik White napisał:
> make it easy: if you start an application which do the flash and after
> this a reset.. nothing should happen. I do it that way.
> the application resist completly in RAM .. and all important libs are
> in RAm or in Filesystem Cache.
> It's only important that you pretend any Application from accessing
> Datafiles or start of new application ...
>
> Alternativly, you can put it in a reserved RAM Area ( mark it not
> usable by Linux) and put a Flash Code in your Bootloader (U-boot?)
> after a reset....
>
> But overwrite a cramfs works for me on >100 times without problems.
>
>
Problems with changing cramfs and reboot may vary depending on changes
made to filesystem.
You can't even call reboot, bacause it's not in the prevoius location
after changing flash.
> Am Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:54:45 +0200 schrieb Antonio Di Bacco
> <antonio.dibacco at aruba.it> :
>
>
>> Yes you are right, it is not a good idea to overwrite working cramfs
>> filesystem. But what happens if I download the new cramfs plus kernel in RAM,
>> do a checksum and then, completely in kernel mode, disabling all the
>> interrupts, I write to flash? No process could complain that I am overwriting
>> because no one is executing.
>>
>>
Maybe such feature should be added to MTD code.
But disabling interrupts may cause watchdog reset in most embedded
platforms.
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list