Which kernel tree for future 8xx development?
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Fri Feb 18 04:48:34 EST 2005
In message <200502171650.53799.david.jander at protonic.nl> you wrote:
>
>
> Now I am observing myself doing apparently absurd things as for example taking
> arch/ppc/8260_io/cpm_spi.c from DENX and putting it into arch/ppc/8xx_io/
> from bitkeeper and hacking until it works (again). It still doesn't. Where on
> earth is the original driver (which was for MPC860, not MPC8260)!??
That's probably arch/ppc/8xx_io/cpm_spi.c from our old linux-2.4
kernelk tree.
> Before we port all of our stuff once again from one tree to another, can
> someone please give me a good advice on which way to go now and in forseeable
> future?
I cannot answer this question - maybe once there is a clear split
between stable and development kernel trees again. At the moment
there is only chaos.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
See us @ Embedded World, Nuremberg, Feb 22 - 24, Hall 10.0 Booth 310
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Mr. Cole's Axiom:
The sum of the intelligence on the planet is a constant;
the population is growing.
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list