Ebony Board, PPC440GP and NFS panics
Brian Hawley
bhawley at luminex.com
Thu May 20 03:09:16 EST 2004
Thanks.
In a previous kernel, I had sync'd up the bd_t...but in the 2.5-ocp,
I did not add the "defined(CONFIG_440)" to the 405 around the
ethernet section.
Not out of the woods yet...but a little closer.
Thanks.
At 01:37 PM 5/19/04 -0400, Mark Chambers wrote:
>We think that is because linux is thinking the MAC address is
> > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff instead of what
> > it really is. u-boot doesn't seem to have a problem getting the MAC
> > address out of the ebony board, but
> > this linux kernel seems to.
> >
>
>A MAC address of ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff is the broadcast address, so that's a
>problem. I'm not familiar with 440, but the thing is, you've got to find
>your ethernet specific code in the kernel and see where it's getting the MAC
>from. u-boot passes a bd_t pointer to the kernel (a struct with a bunch of
>board data), but there's probably some kind of mis-match between u-boot and
>the platform config of the kernel.
>
>Mark Chambers
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list