ELDK 3.0 C++ Problem
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Fri May 21 02:14:16 EST 2004
In message <200405201602.44480.c.parravicini at sehitaly.com> you wrote:
>
> > What makes you think so? I bet a case of beer that the 'new" returned
> > just fine, and that your program segfaulted in memset() instead.
>
> Lost the beer, the code is wrong but the segfaulted is in the "new"
> (checked with a printf before the memset & also with gdb eh eh)
No. The new returns just fine in my test. The segfault happens in the
memset() call when you write to memory that you don't own. I tested
it.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
The Buddha, the Godhead, resides quite as comfortably in the circuits
of a digital computer or the gears of a cycle transmission as he does
at the top of a mountain or in the petals of a flower.
- R. Pirsig, "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list