[PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/85xx: Add C293PCIE board support
Liu Po-B43644
B43644 at freescale.com
Mon Jul 29 12:20:11 EST 2013
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 5:59 AM
> To: Liu Po-B43644
> Cc: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org; galak at kernel.crashing.org; Fleming Andy-
> AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Liu Po-B43644
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/85xx: Add C293PCIE board support
>
> On 07/25/2013 09:41:19 PM, Po Liu wrote:
> > + partition at 1900000 {
> > + /* 7MB for User Area */
> > + reg = <0x01900000 0x00700000>;
> > + label = "NAND User area";
> > + };
> > +
> > + partition at 2000000 {
> > + /* 96MB for Root File System */
> > + reg = <0x02000000 0x06000000>;
> > + label = "NAND Root File System";
> > + };
> > +
> > + partition at 8000000 {
> > + /* 3968MB for Others */
> > + reg = <0x08000000 0xF8000000>;
> > + label = "NAND Others";
> > + };
>
> Again, what is the difference between "user area" and "others"? I'm not
> even sure why it needs to be separate from "root file system", but at
> least the root filesystem should be larger given the size of the overall
> flash.
Do you mean just merge up four partition into one "RFS"? Or merge up four partition into "RFS" and "User area" is better?
>
> Also please use lowercase for hex.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + cpld at 2,0 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "fsl,c293pcie-cpld";
> > + reg = <0x2 0x0 0x20>;
> > + };
>
> Remove #address-cells/#size-cells
>
> > + partition at 580000 {
> > + /* 10.5MB for Compressed RFS Image */
> > + reg = <0x00580000 0x00a80000>;
> > + label = "SPI Flash Compressed RFSImage";
> > + };
>
> Space before "Image". Why specifiy that it's compressed, versus some
> other filesystem type?
>
Remove all the "compressed" comments when express the RFS partition?
> -Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list