[PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/85xx: Add C293PCIE board support

Liu Po-B43644 B43644 at freescale.com
Mon Jul 29 12:20:11 EST 2013



>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Wood Scott-B07421
>  Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 5:59 AM
>  To: Liu Po-B43644
>  Cc: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org; galak at kernel.crashing.org; Fleming Andy-
>  AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Liu Po-B43644
>  Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/85xx: Add C293PCIE board support
>  
>  On 07/25/2013 09:41:19 PM, Po Liu wrote:
>  > +		partition at 1900000 {
>  > +			/* 7MB for User Area */
>  > +			reg = <0x01900000 0x00700000>;
>  > +			label = "NAND User area";
>  > +		};
>  > +
>  > +		partition at 2000000 {
>  > +			/* 96MB for Root File System */
>  > +			reg = <0x02000000 0x06000000>;
>  > +			label = "NAND Root File System";
>  > +		};
>  > +
>  > +		partition at 8000000 {
>  > +			/* 3968MB for Others */
>  > +			reg = <0x08000000 0xF8000000>;
>  > +			label = "NAND Others";
>  > +		};
>  
>  Again, what is the difference between "user area" and "others"?  I'm not
>  even sure why it needs to be separate from "root file system", but at
>  least the root filesystem should be larger given the size of the overall
>  flash.
Do you mean just merge up four partition into one "RFS"? Or merge up four partition into "RFS" and "User area" is better?
>  
>  Also please use lowercase for hex.
>  
>  > +	};
>  > +
>  > +	cpld at 2,0 {
>  > +		#address-cells = <1>;
>  > +		#size-cells = <1>;
>  > +		compatible = "fsl,c293pcie-cpld";
>  > +		reg = <0x2 0x0 0x20>;
>  > +	};
>  
>  Remove #address-cells/#size-cells
>  
>  > +			partition at 580000 {
>  > +				/* 10.5MB for Compressed RFS Image */
>  > +				reg = <0x00580000 0x00a80000>;
>  > +				label = "SPI Flash Compressed RFSImage";
>  > +			};
>  
>  Space before "Image".  Why specifiy that it's compressed, versus some
>  other filesystem type?
>  
Remove all the "compressed" comments when express the RFS partition?
>  -Scott



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list