[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add dts files for P1021RDB-PC board

[Jiucheng Xu]

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 06:48 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Xu Jiucheng wrote:
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc.dtsi    |  236 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_32b.dts |   96 ++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_36b.dts |   96 ++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dts        |   96 ------------
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dtsi       |  236 -----------------------------
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb_36b.dts    |   96 ------------
> > 6 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 428 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc.dtsi
> > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_32b.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_36b.dts
> > delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dts
> > delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dtsi
> > delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb_36b.dts
> 
> Do we really need a 32 & 36 bit device tree for this board?  Isnt the memory fixed so why not just have 32b?
> 
I have no idea, 36 bit is already there in the history release of SDK,
If it is not necessary for upstream, I can resend a new patch without 36
bit.
> Also, why are you removing the dts for the older P1021RDB??
> 
> - k
This dts for the older P1021RDB was committed by me. I just rename these
files in order to keep uniformity with other platforms, e.g
"P1020rdb-pc.dtsi  p1020mbg-pc.dtsi". If you think it doesn't matter,
please ignore this patch.

If AMP is a specific application as Timur says, please ignore the AMP
patch.

Thanks,
Jiucheng