[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add dts files for P1021RDB-PC board

[Kumar Gala]

On Jul 11, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Jiucheng Xu wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 06:48 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Xu Jiucheng wrote:
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc.dtsi    |  236 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_32b.dts |   96 ++++++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_36b.dts |   96 ++++++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dts        |   96 ------------
>>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dtsi       |  236 -----------------------------
>>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb_36b.dts    |   96 ------------
>>> 6 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 428 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc.dtsi
>>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_32b.dts
>>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb-pc_36b.dts
>>> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dts
>>> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb.dtsi
>>> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1021rdb_36b.dts
>> 
>> Do we really need a 32 & 36 bit device tree for this board?  Isnt the memory fixed so why not just have 32b?
>> 
> I have no idea, 36 bit is already there in the history release of SDK,
> If it is not necessary for upstream, I can resend a new patch without 36
> bit.
>> Also, why are you removing the dts for the older P1021RDB??
>> 
>> - k
> This dts for the older P1021RDB was committed by me. I just rename these
> files in order to keep uniformity with other platforms, e.g
> "P1020rdb-pc.dtsi  p1020mbg-pc.dtsi". If you think it doesn't matter,
> please ignore this patch.

Sorry, I was thinking there was a different board for P1021RDB (older than P1021RDB-PC), like we have for P1020RDB.

> If AMP is a specific application as Timur says, please ignore the AMP
> patch.

- k