[RFC][PATCH 28/30] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1023RDS device tree

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Nov 11 07:24:56 EST 2011


On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:42:54PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> 
>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:14:11AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> -		power at e0070{
>>>> -			compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-pmc", "fsl,mpc8548-pmc",
>>>> -			             "fsl,p1022-pmc";
>>>> -			reg = <0xe0070 0x20>;
>>>> -			etsec1_clk: soc-clk at B0{
>>>> -				fsl,pmcdr-mask = <0x00000080>;
>>>> -			};
>>>> -			etsec2_clk: soc-clk at B1{
>>>> -				fsl,pmcdr-mask = <0x00000040>;
>>>> -			};
>>>> -			etsec3_clk: soc-clk at B2{
>>>> -				fsl,pmcdr-mask = <0x00000020>;
>>>> -			};
>>>> -		};
>>> 
>>> The compatibles on this node are wrong, but it looks like you're removing
>>> it altogether?
>>> 
>>> -Scott
>> 
>> Yeah, I think the whole thing needs to be relocated at because there are no etsec's on P1023, etc.  So will comment about this in commit message
> 
> Ah right, the etsec stuff should go as well. :-)
> 
> It should look like this:
> 
> 	power at e0070 {
> 		compatible = "fsl,p1023-pmc", "fsl,mpc8548-pmc";
> 		reg = <0xe0070 0x20>;
> 	};

What does being compatible with mpc8548-pmc mean?

- k


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list