[PATCH 1/2] fs_enet: fix checkpatch.pl problems

John Rigby jcrigby at gmail.com
Wed Jun 18 23:29:17 EST 2008


I agree, I'll separate the fec_t -> struct fec changes out.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby <jrigby at freescale.com> wrote:
> > Fixed all errors and warnings that checkpatch.pl
> > reports if this was a new submission.
> > Also changed instances of fec_t to struct fec in
> > mac-fec.c and mii-fec.c.
>
> Nit: checkpatch is not law; particularly in the case of whitespace
> change.  Personally, I think cleaning up whitespace in this regard
> causes more problems than it solves.  Plus, it makes the important
> change (fec_t -> struct fec) get lost in a see of unimportant ones
> which makes for hard reviewing.
>
> But I must sleep now; I'll review your other patch tomorrow.
>
> Cheers,
> g.
>
> --
> Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
> Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20080618/6acf232e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list