ppc32: Weird process scheduling behaviour with 2.6.24-rc
vatsa at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sat Jan 26 20:27:25 EST 2008
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:15:52PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Michel,
> > You had reported that commit 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8
> > was the cause for this bad behavior. Do you see behavior change (from good->bad)
> > immediately after applying that patch during your bisect process?
> Also Michel, double check your .config in both cases.
And also Michel whether CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED + CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED
gives more or less same desktop exp as !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED pls!
> > I would prefer to have CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED +
> > CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED on by default. Can you pls let me know how you
> > think is the desktop experience with that combination?
> I'm going to give that a try but unfortunately, it will have to wait
> until I'm back from LCA in a bit more than a week.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev