ppc32: Weird process scheduling behaviour with 2.6.24-rc
Michel Dänzer
michel at tungstengraphics.com
Fri Jan 25 22:34:27 EST 2008
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:54 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Another question, do you have:
> > CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
> >
> > if so, does flipping that off have any effect?
>
> Yes.
>
> Here, I do the test of running 4 times the repro-case provided by Michel
> with nice 19 and a dd eating CPU with nice 0.
>
> Without this option, I get the dd at 100% and the nice 19 shells down
> below it with whatever is left of the CPUs.
>
> With this option, dd gets about 50% of one CPU and the niced processes
> still get most of the time.
Hmm, interesting. As I said before, I thought I had tested with this
disabled and not seen a difference, but I'll try again to confirm.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list