[i2c] [PATCH] mpc i2c driver, compare to NO_IRQ instead of zero

Jon Smirl jonsmirl at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 09:32:07 EST 2008


Ben, do you approve of this? How should error be checked for, is
<NO_IRQ right? The current code in the kernel looks to be broken
because of these checks, the ppc build is wrong and powerpc polled
mode doesn't work.

On 1/21/08, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Alter the mpc i2c driver to use the NO_IRQ symbol instead of the constant zero when checking for valid interrupts. NO_IRQ=-1 on ppc and NO_IRQ=0 on powerpc so the checks against zero are not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl at gmail.com>
> ---
>
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c |   10 +++++-----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> index bbe787b..d20959d 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int i2c_wait(struct mpc_i2c *i2c, unsigned timeout, int writing)
>         u32 x;
>         int result = 0;
>
> -       if (i2c->irq == 0)
> +       if (i2c->irq == NO_IRQ)
>         {
>                 while (!(readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR) & CSR_MIF)) {
>                         schedule();
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
>         i2c->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -       if (i2c->irq < 0) {
> +       if (i2c->irq < NO_IRQ) {
>                 result = -ENXIO;
>                 goto fail_get_irq;
>         }
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 goto fail_map;
>         }
>
> -       if (i2c->irq != 0)
> +       if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
>                 if ((result = request_irq(i2c->irq, mpc_i2c_isr,
>                                           IRQF_SHARED, "i2c-mpc", i2c)) < 0) {
>                         printk(KERN_ERR
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         return result;
>
>        fail_add:
> -       if (i2c->irq != 0)
> +       if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
>                 free_irq(i2c->irq, i2c);
>        fail_irq:
>         iounmap(i2c->base);
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         i2c_del_adapter(&i2c->adap);
>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> -       if (i2c->irq != 0)
> +       if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
>                 free_irq(i2c->irq, i2c);
>
>         iounmap(i2c->base);
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2c mailing list
> i2c at lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
>


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list