[PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layerfunctionality

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 06:13:08PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 
> > linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se at ozlabs.org 
> > [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+joakim.tjernlund=transmode.se at ozl
> > abs.org] On Behalf Of Vitaly Bordug
> > Sent: den 6 december 2007 23:51
> > To: Paul Mackerras
> > Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not 
> > duplicate PHY layerfunctionality
> > 
> > 
> > With that patch fixed.c now fully emulates MDIO bus, thus no need
> > to duplicate PHY layer functionality. That, in turn, drastically
> > simplifies the code, and drops down line count.
> > 
> > As an additional bonus, now there is no need to register MDIO bus
> > for each PHY, all emulated PHYs placed on the platform fixed MDIO bus.
> > There is also no more need to pre-allocate PHYs via .config option,
> > this is all now handled dynamically.
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov at ru.mvista.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vitb at kernel.crashing.org>
> > Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff at garzik.org>
> 
> What happened to this patch set? Is it sitting in a tree somewhere waiting
> for 2.4.25 or does it need more work?
        ^ we're too late then. ;-)

Patches already began to fuzz at the fsl_soc.c, yet more time and
they'll reject to apply. So.. Paul, Kumar can we get this in for
2.6.25?

I believe afterward this one will need some attention too:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048473.html

Thanks in advance,


p.s. I just noticed that "fsl_soc: add support for gianfar for
fixed-link .." patch could be cosmetically improved (removing
casts, adding checks for size after the of_get_property), but I
hope we can do this on top of already applied patches.

Thanks again,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou at mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou at yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2