PCI interrupt assignment on sequoia board
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jan 10 03:18:26 EST 2008
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:53:22 +0100
Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs at esd-electronics.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that Josh's 'for-2.5.25' does not assign PCI interrupts correctly:
>
> bash-3.00# lspci -v
> 00:00.0 Class 0680: 1014:027f
> Subsystem: 10e8:cafe
> Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16
> Memory at <unassigned> (32-bit, prefetchable)
> Capabilities: [58] Power Management version 2
>
> 00:0a.0 Class 0b20: 1014:027f (this is a PPC440EPx PCI target board in a sequoia PCI slot)
> Subsystem: 12fe:0441
> Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 128, IRQ 16
> Memory at 0000000180000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
> Memory at 0000000184000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=16M]
> Capabilities: [58] Power Management version 2
>
> 00:0c.0 Class 0200: 168c:0013 (rev 01)
> Subsystem: 14b7:0a60
> Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 128, IRQ 16
> Memory at 0000000185000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
> Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
>
> bash-3.00# uname -a
> Linux sequoia 2.6.24-rc6-g78994e24 #5 Wed Jan 9 16:22:31 CET 2008 ppc ppc ppc GNU/Linux
>
>
> All interrupts are '16'. But I expected 67 as correctly stated in the device tree.
> This test has been made with the uboot wrapper code.
>
> Any idea?
Does lspci display the virtual IRQ number that is assigned when the
device tree is parsed and interrupts are mapped? I think so. If you
look at the other devices in /proc/interrupts you'll see they have the
virtual IRQ numbers as well.
josh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list