[PATCH 1/3] Add support for binary includes.

[Jon Loeliger]

So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> 
> 
> Hrm.  Can we leave this one until after 1.1?   Since it adds new
> syntax, I think it would be worth cogitating a bit longer.

Double hrm.

Scott, can you remind us why this feature was requested
off the U-Boot list, please?  I'm trying to decide if we
really do want to get it into the 1.1 release.

Thanks,
jdl