[PATCH] [POWERPC] 4xx: Add endpoint support to 4xx PCIe driver
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Apr 10 20:35:35 EST 2008
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 12:21 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Sure, this would be optimal. But frankly, I currently have no need for
> non U-Boot mode, and therefore I didn't implement it. This can be
> added later
> when really needed don't you think?
It can... but on the other hand, it's not hard :-)
> Good. But again, I would really prefer to first include this U-Boot
> endpoint support and later add this independent device tree endpoint
> configuration when really needed.
Well, you are the one with a use case... but I do think we should
differenciate a PCI in host mode vs. endpoint mode right away. We don't
want the PCI stack from kicking in at all in endpoint mode, we don't
want to bother with creating the PCI infrastructure and config space
> Good idea. How about "vendor-id" and "device-id"? And we probably need
> for endpoint mode too now. "vendor-id-endpoint" and
If the host bridge in EP mode has a different name/type than the host
bridge one, just 'vendor-id' and 'device-id' will do there too.
> And how should we handle the backward compatibility? Should I set the
> values as default when those properties are not available?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev