cpu frequency governor regression (?)
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Thu Dec 13 04:30:01 EST 2007
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:52:45PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No idea who to bother with this and maybe it's just a
> misconfiguration... Apologies if my guesses are totally wrong.
>
> I'm currently on 2.6.24-rc3 (+wireless-2.6#everything) but couldn't find
> any patches between that and 2.6.24-rc5 that seemed relevant.
>
> On my quad powermac, I'm seeing the cpufreq governor changed by a
> hibernation cycle. My default governor is "userspace", which is driven
> by powernowd (because the latency is too high "ondemand" doesn't like my
> machine) but after a hibernation cycle I'm having the governor set to
> "performance".
bizarre. It should default back to whatever CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_* option
was set. (Arguably a bug in itself, as we don't track & restore them
on resume, so if you changed from the default after booting: splat)
Why you're getting the performance governor is puzzling though.
Can you enable CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG=y, and boot with cpufreq.debug=7
and send the log from a transition across hibernate?
Also, does /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor
have performance in *all* the cpus?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list