[PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc

Josh Boyer jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Aug 21 01:53:22 EST 2007


On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:44:31 -0500
Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:

> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500
> > Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back  
> >>into arch/ppc/kernel?  or just include files?
> > 
> > 
> > What would be the point of doing that?  I would think we want the
> > opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
> > arch/ppc compiles as possible.  Sort of shows how much is "left" to
> > port.
> 
> The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one doesn't 
> need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change to arch/powerpc.

Who worries about that? ;).

Ok, I can see that.  Still seems wasteful to me though.

josh



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list