[PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Aug 21 01:53:22 EST 2007
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:44:31 -0500
Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500
> > Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back
> >>into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files?
> >
> >
> > What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the
> > opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
> > arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to
> > port.
>
> The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one doesn't
> need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change to arch/powerpc.
Who worries about that? ;).
Ok, I can see that. Still seems wasteful to me though.
josh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list