[PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Tue Aug 21 01:44:31 EST 2007
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500
> Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back
>>into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files?
>
>
> What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the
> opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
> arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to
> port.
The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one doesn't
need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change to arch/powerpc.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list