[PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc

[Segher Boessenkool]

>> What would be the point of doing that?  I would think we want the
>> opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
>> arch/ppc compiles as possible.  Sort of shows how much is "left" to
>> port.
>
> The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one doesn't
> need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change to 
> arch/powerpc.

We should make arch/ppc as broken as possible so no one can
complain when it is finally removed.  I'll remove the config
from my auto-builder right now :-)


Segher