[PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Aug 21 01:37:19 EST 2007
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500
Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2007, at 1:00 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:05:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> This patch series removes the need for include/asm-ppc in the
> >> ARCH=powerpc
> >> build for ppc32. They exist in the following git tree:
> >>
> >> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git
> >> for-2.6.24
> >>
> >> posting here for everyone else to see.
> >>
> >> Updated with changes suggested by Arnd & Segher. (removal 82xx pci
> >> header
> >> and moving some headers under platforms if not globally needed).
> >
> > Nice! I'm hoping the next step after this is to do the other way
> > around - make ARCH=ppc builds independent of things in arch/powerpc or
> > include/asm-powerpc, which is almost the more important change.
>
> Maybe, hadn't thought about that case. One thing at a time :)
>
> Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back
> into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files?
What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the
opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to
port.
Also, making arch/ppc compile stand-alone again would be "wasted" work,
since it's going to die anyway.
josh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list