PCI init vs. memory init
linas at austin.ibm.com
Sat Apr 29 09:04:01 EST 2006
I'd previously reported a problem where the PCI subsystem
was getting inited before the memory subsystem. In the unusual
case of an EEH failure, this resulted in a crash in kmalloc,
which I hacked around with a if(!mem_init_done).
You mentioned that the sequence of inits seemed wrong, that the
PCI init should be done later, after the memory init. I think
I agree; but when I took a very very quick look at the code, there
was no obvious hook in later init to move the PCI init over to.
Are you pursuing this further? Should I dig into it? Any bright
ideas? Am I missing something obvious?
There are several spots in in the powerpc PCI init code where
a boot_mem alloc is used instead of kmalloc, and this boot_mem is
then hacked around in the case of a PCI hotplug remove. It would
be nice to fix this...
More information about the Linuxppc-dev