building ppc_htab?

Tom Rini trini at
Thu Mar 17 09:11:53 EST 2005

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:57:24AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:

> Is there any reason not to make the following change so we build 
> ppc_htab only on PPC STD MMU?  This would also require fixing up 
> fs/proc/proc_misc.c.

I could have sworn, but maybe my memory sucks, that we no longer messed
w/ fs/proc/proc_misc.c for any of the PPC-specific things (since in 2.6
you can do all of that proc magic in your 'driver').  So this patch
would make a great deal of sense to do, and if it lacks what I'm talking
about, we should do that part as well :)

Tom Rini

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list