building ppc_htab?

Dan Malek dan at
Thu Mar 17 04:12:28 EST 2005

On Mar 16, 2005, at 1:57 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:

> Is there any reason not to make the following change so we build 
> ppc_htab only on PPC STD MMU?  This would also require fixing up 
> fs/proc/proc_misc.c.

Does it actually build properly this way?  There used to be 
defined there, needed for linking resolution at least.  There were also 
generally called functions, that usually didn't do anything unless 
there was
a hash table used.  If that is fixed up, then this is fine :-)


	-- Dan

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list