building ppc_htab?
Kumar Gala
kumar.gala at freescale.com
Fri Mar 18 04:34:14 EST 2005
On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:11 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:57:24AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason not to make the following change so we build
> > ppc_htab only on PPC STD MMU? This would also require fixing up
> > fs/proc/proc_misc.c.
>
> I could have sworn, but maybe my memory sucks, that we no longer messed
> w/ fs/proc/proc_misc.c for any of the PPC-specific things (since in 2.6
> you can do all of that proc magic in your 'driver'). So this patch
> would make a great deal of sense to do, and if it lacks what I'm
> talking
> about, we should do that part as well :)
I'm not exactly clear on what you are talking about. There is this
snippet in fs/proc/proc_misc.c:
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
{
extern struct file_operations ppc_htab_operations;
entry = create_proc_entry("ppc_htab", S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
NULL);
if (entry)
entry->proc_fops = &ppc_htab_operations;
}
#endif
Are you suggesting this should live elsewhere? I'm not that familiar
with proc code.
- kumar
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list