Where to get Paul's tree [was Re: problem building 2.3.47: no macintosh.a file]

[Dan Bethe]

	Hi guys.  Does this mean that we've converted the linuxppc-dev source
tree to Bitkeeeper?
	If so, is it suitable?  Can we finally get rid of these multiple
fractured personal trees maintained independantly by such esteemed
studly hackerly gentlemen as Paul and BenH?  And if so, can we please
have an official detailed announcement and instructions on the use of
Bitkeeper?
	If not, what is needed?  Do we want a CVS tree in the meantime?  Or
shall we just leave it alone until the current final solution arrives
in the form of Bitkeeper?
	Keep knockin em down, guys.

--- phandel at cise.ufl.edu wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Lou Langholtz wrote:
>
> > I also don't actually know anymore where to get Paul's source tree.
>
> Paul's devel:
> rsync -auvz linuxcare.com.au::linux-pmac-devel
> /usr/src/linux-2.3-devel
>
> Bitkeeper devel:
> rsync -auvz hq.fsmlabs.com::linuxppc_2_3 /usr/src/linux-2.3-bit
> (Read about the bitkeeper tree:
> http://www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html)


=====
"Don't expect your own messiah; this neverworld which you desire is
only in your mind." -- http://www.dreamtheater.net/songb4.htm#IV5

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/