[PATCH v2 0/2] Add device tree for ASRock Rack ALTRAD8 BMC

Rebecca Cran rebecca at bsdio.com
Tue Sep 23 06:47:29 AEST 2025


On 9/21/25 20:40, Andrew Jeffery wrote:

> On Wed, 2025-09-17 at 12:04 -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>> aspeed-bmc-asrock-altrad8.dts:578.16-581.6: Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /ahb/spi at 1e630000/flash at 0/partitions/code at 400000: duplicate unit-address (also used in node /ahb/spi at 1e630000/flash at 0/partitions/tfa at 400000)
> It seems odd that the partitions intersect. Are the offsets correct? If
> they are, can you add comments to the DTS discussing what's going on
> there?
I'll delete the code partition. I added it to make it easier for my 
script to flash both TF-A and UEFI areas at once.
>
>> aspeed-bmc-asrock-altrad8.dtb: gpio at 1c (nxp,pca9557): '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio at 0', 'gpio at 1', 'gpio at 2', 'gpio at 3', 'gpio at 4', 'gpio at 5', 'gpio at 6', 'gpio at 7' do not match any of the regexes: '^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$', '^pinctrl-[0-9]+$'
>> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml#
> This one needs fixing.

I'm confused, because in the existing device tree files I'm only seeing 
'hog' used in the &gpio node, while 'pca[0-9]+' is commonly used as the 
node names for pca95xx devices.

Does the gpio-pca95xx.yaml file need to be updated?


-- 

Rebecca Cran



More information about the Linux-aspeed mailing list