[RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences

Thierry Reding thierry.reding at avionic-design.de
Thu Aug 2 00:01:21 EST 2012


On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:38:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:26:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This is why __devinit data will only be discarded when this is not
> > > possible.
> 
> > That's exactly my point. But I seem to have miserably failed to get that
> > across. =)
> 
> We must be talking at cross purposes then.  What I'm saying is that the
> framework shouldn't rely on platform data and should assume that the
> kernel might be configured so it can be discarded (by copying most
> likely).

Yes. I think this should be solved by the power_seq_build() function
which uses the platform data description of the sequence and builds it
into something for internal use that doesn't rely on anything in the
platform data.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20120801/0f5c26a6/attachment.sig>


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list