pata_of_platform.c cannot build on sparc

Rob Herring robherring2 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 23 00:38:53 EST 2011


On 12/21/2011 07:40 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 07:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring<robherring2 at gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:25:15 -0600
>>
>>> On 12/21/2011 04:38 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It depends upon CONFIG_OF_IRQ which not all CONFIG_OF platforms
>>>> support,
>>>> in particular sparc does not support CONFIG_OF_PLATFORM because it
>>>> precomputes all IRQs at boot time when it scans the device tree so all
>>>> of the CONFIG_OF_IRQ infrastructure to probe and resolve IRQs at driver
>>>> probe time is wrong and completely unnecessary.
>>>>
>>>> Add the proper dependencies so that pata_of_platform.c doesn't get
>>>> built on sparc.
>>>>
>>>> CONFIG_OF_IRQ was severely misdesigned, it should just NOP out on
>>>> platforms where the architecture has the final IRQ values already like
>>>> sparc does.  But that's not how it was implemented at all, and now
>>>> we're starting to have all of these drivers get hard dependencies on
>>>> this mechanism and it's datastructures, and the resulting sparc build
>>>> failures from time to time.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff, please push something like the following to Linus so that
>>>> sparc's allmodconfig builds again.  Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Really, drivers should no longer use of_irq_to_resource (or
>>> of_address_to_resource for that matter). The resources are setup by the
>>> core OF code. The patch I sent does this.
>>
>> Thanks for taking care of this.
> 
> Being so late in 3.2-rc, it would be preferred to apply&push David's
> patch for 3.2, and then get Rob's into libata-dev#upstream (linux-next).
> 
> That OK?
> 

Fine by me.

Rob


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list