[ANN] Meeting minutes of the Cambourne meeting

[Grant Likely]

On Aug 30, 2011 2:36 PM, "Grant Likely" <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2011 2:19 PM, "Mark Brown" <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> > > Would such a device be included in the DT ? My understanding is that
the DT
> > > should only describe the hardware.
> >
> > For ASoC they will be, the view is that the schematic for the board is
> > sufficiently interesting to count as hardware.
>
> Yes. Aggregate devices are sufficiently complex that there is a strong
argument for using a node to describe one.

...and it would still be describing hardware.

g.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20110830/ae5bf3cb/attachment.html>