[ANN] Meeting minutes of the Cambourne meeting

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Wed Aug 31 06:35:59 EST 2011


On Aug 30, 2011 2:19 PM, "Mark Brown" <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > Would such a device be included in the DT ? My understanding is that the
DT
> > should only describe the hardware.
>
> For ASoC they will be, the view is that the schematic for the board is
> sufficiently interesting to count as hardware.

Yes. Aggregate devices are sufficiently complex that there is a strong
argument for using a node to describe one.

g.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20110830/95ac6bc3/attachment.html>


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list