[SLOF] [PATCH kernel] RFC: prom_init: Fetch flatten device tree from the system firmware

[David Gibson]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:22:55PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 16/10/17 17:11, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:49:17PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> At the moment, on 256CPU + 256 PCI devices guest, it takes the guest
> >> about 8.5sec to read the entire device tree. Some explanation can be
> >> found here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/826124/ but mostly it is
> >> because the kernel traverses the tree twice and it calls "getprop" for
> >> each properly which is really SLOF as it searches from the linked list
> >> beginning every time.
> >>
> >> Since SLOF has just learned to build FDT and this takes less than 0.5sec
> >> for such a big guest, this makes use of the proposed client interface
> >> method - "fdt-fetch".
> >>
> >> If "fdt-fetch" is not available, the old method is used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
> > 
> > I like the concept, few details though..
> > 
> >> ---
> >>  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
> >> index 02190e90c7ae..daa50a153737 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
> >> @@ -2498,6 +2498,31 @@ static void __init flatten_device_tree(void)
> >>  		prom_panic("Can't allocate initial device-tree chunk\n");
> >>  	mem_end = mem_start + room;
> >>  
> >> +	if (!call_prom_ret("fdt-fetch", 2, 1, NULL, mem_start,
> >> +			   room - sizeof(mem_reserve_map))) {
> >> +		u32 size;
> >> +
> >> +		hdr = (void *) mem_start;
> >> +
> >> +		/* Fixup the boot cpuid */
> >> +		hdr->boot_cpuid_phys = cpu_to_be32(prom.cpu);
> > 
> > If SLOF is generating a tree it really should get this header field
> > right as well.
> 
> 
> Ah, I did not realize it is just a phandle from /chosen/cpu. Will
> fix.

It's not a phandle.  It's just the "address" (i.e. reg value) of the
boot cpu.

> >> +		/* Append the reserved map to the end of the blob */
> >> +		hdr->off_mem_rsvmap = hdr->totalsize;
> >> +		size = be32_to_cpu(hdr->totalsize);
> >> +		rsvmap = (void *) hdr + size;
> >> +		hdr->totalsize = cpu_to_be32(size + sizeof(mem_reserve_map));
> >> +		memcpy(rsvmap, mem_reserve_map, sizeof(mem_reserve_map));
> > 
> > .. and the reserve map for that matter.  I don't really understand
> > what you're doing here. 
> 
> ? Get the blob, increase the FDT size by sizeof(mem_reserve_map), fix up
> totalsize and off_mem_rsvmap, copy mem_reserve_map to the end of the blob
> (the actual order is slightly different, may be a bit confusing).

Right.. but where is mem_reserve_map coming from, if it hasn't come
from an FDT?

> Asking SLOF to reserve the space seems to be unnecessary complication of
> the interface - SLOF does not provide any reserved memory records.

Ah.. right, the reservations are coming from the pre-prom kernel, not
from the firmware itself.  Yeah, that makes sense.  Ok, this makes
sense then...

> > Note also that the reserve map is required to
> > be 8-byte aligned, which totalsize might not be.
> 
> Ah, good point.

..at least with that fixed and maybe some comments to make what's
gonig on clearer.

> 
> 
> > 
> >> +		/* Store the DT address */
> >> +		dt_header_start = mem_start;
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef DEBUG_PROM
> >> +		prom_printf("Fetched DTB: %d bytes to @%x\n", size, mem_start);
> >> +#endif
> >> +		goto print_exit;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >>  	/* Get root of tree */
> >>  	root = call_prom("peer", 1, 1, (phandle)0);
> >>  	if (root == (phandle)0)
> >> @@ -2548,6 +2573,7 @@ static void __init flatten_device_tree(void)
> >>  	/* Copy the reserve map in */
> >>  	memcpy(rsvmap, mem_reserve_map, sizeof(mem_reserve_map));
> >>  
> >> +print_exit:
> >>  #ifdef DEBUG_PROM
> >>  	{
> >>  		int i;
> > 
> 
> 




-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/slof/attachments/20171016/38dc1e68/attachment.sig>