[Skiboot] [RFC PATCH] direct-controls: Use P8 sequence from workbook
Oliver
oohall at gmail.com
Tue Mar 12 12:07:21 AEDT 2019
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:31 AM Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> When attempting to do SRESET under load, our existing implementation
> fell down and would fail to SRESET some CPUs, causing the fast-reboot
> to fail. This is reproduced by running the (new) op-test test
> testcases.OpTestFastReboot.FastRebootHostStressTorture - and especially
> so if you up the `stress` invocation to be 120 seconds.
>
> See PR for op-test: https://github.com/open-power/op-test-framework/pull/437
>
> Unfortunately, this patch itself isn't the whole story. It makes things
> *better* but there's still a window. Mind you, with this patch I've
> seen it pass 24 fast-reboots, which is around 22 more than previously.
Damn, it's almost like fast-reboot is a dumb hack that should have
been opt-in to begin with ;)
>
> The same problem has been observed with pdbg, see discussion there
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/pdbg/2019-March/001076.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> core/direct-controls.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/core/direct-controls.c b/core/direct-controls.c
> index 1d0f6818e2c8..8783a83a25ac 100644
> --- a/core/direct-controls.c
> +++ b/core/direct-controls.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* Copyright 2017 IBM Corp.
> +/* Copyright 2017-2019 IBM Corp.
> *
> * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
> * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ static void mambo_stop_cpu(struct cpu_thread *cpu)
> #define P8_DIRECT_CTL_STOP PPC_BIT(63)
> #define P8_DIRECT_CTL_PRENAP PPC_BIT(47)
> #define P8_DIRECT_CTL_SRESET PPC_BIT(60)
> +#define P8_EX_TCTL_RAS_STATUS(t) (0x10013002 + (t) * 0x10)
> +#define P8_RAS_STATUS_SRQ_EMPTY PPC_BIT(8)
> +#define P8_RAS_STATUS_LSU_QUIESCED PPC_BIT(9)
> +#define P8_RAS_STATUS_INST_COMPLETE PPC_BIT(12)
> +#define P8_RAS_STATUS_THREAD_ACTIVE PPC_BIT(48)
> +#define P8_RAS_STATUS_TS_QUIESCE PPC_BIT(49)
>
> static int p8_core_set_special_wakeup(struct cpu_thread *cpu)
> {
> @@ -224,6 +230,9 @@ static int p8_stop_thread(struct cpu_thread *cpu)
> uint32_t chip_id = pir_to_chip_id(cpu->pir);
> uint32_t thread_id = pir_to_thread_id(cpu->pir);
> uint32_t xscom_addr;
> + uint64_t val;
> + int i;
> + int rc;
>
> xscom_addr = XSCOM_ADDR_P8_EX(core_id,
> P8_EX_TCTL_DIRECT_CONTROLS(thread_id));
> @@ -235,7 +244,38 @@ static int p8_stop_thread(struct cpu_thread *cpu)
> return OPAL_HARDWARE;
> }
>
> - return OPAL_SUCCESS;
> + xscom_addr = XSCOM_ADDR_P8_EX(core_id,
> + P8_EX_TCTL_RAS_STATUS(thread_id));
> + for (i=0; i < 1000; i++) {
> + rc = xscom_read(chip_id, xscom_addr, &val);
> + if (rc) {
> + prlog(PR_ERR, "Could not check state of thread "
> + "%u:%u:%u\n", chip_id, core_id, thread_id);
> + return OPAL_HARDWARE;
> + }
> + prlog(PR_INFO, "RAS_STATUS for %u:%u:%u = 0x%llx\n",
> + chip_id, core_id, thread_id, val);
If this needs to be PR_INFO then you should move it outside the loop
to where the final status is checked. Doing 1000s retries and printing
the status at PR_INFO on each retry is going to be a little spammy.
> + if (val & P8_RAS_STATUS_INST_COMPLETE)
> + break;
> + time_wait_ms(10);
1000 * 10e-3 = 10s timeout, seems a bit excessive?
> + }
> + if (!(val & P8_RAS_STATUS_INST_COMPLETE))
> + return OPAL_HARDWARE;
> +
> + for (i=0; i < 1000; i++) {
> + rc = xscom_read(chip_id, xscom_addr, &val);
> + if (rc) {
> + prlog(PR_ERR, "Could not check state of thread "
> + "%u:%u:%u\n", chip_id, core_id, thread_id);
> + return OPAL_HARDWARE;
> + }
> + prlog(PR_INFO, "RAS_STATUS for %u:%u:%u = 0x%llx\n",
> + chip_id, core_id, thread_id, val);
> + if (val & P8_RAS_STATUS_TS_QUIESCE)
> + return OPAL_SUCCESS;
> + time_wait_ms(10);
> + }
> + return OPAL_HARDWARE;
> }
It might be worth moving the retry logic out of p8_stop_thread() and
doing it at a higher level so we're not blocking on each thread.
>
> static int p8_sreset_thread(struct cpu_thread *cpu)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Skiboot mailing list
> Skiboot at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/skiboot
More information about the Skiboot
mailing list